FOCUS AND SCOPE
The International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies is an open access, double-blind peer-reviewed journal that seeks to disseminate scholarship across the Humanities, Social Sciences, Health Sciences, Law and Education in the field of Indigenous Studies.
A typical manuscript will be between 6,000-8,000 words (double-spaced pages) including tables, endnotes and references (APA 6th edition).
All submitted manuscripts should be original, unpublished, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere at the time of submitting to the International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies.
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
All articles submitted to the journal will undergo a double-blind peer-review by at least two reviewers. Reviews should normally take around 4-6 weeks; however, we have been experiencing delays with reviewer acceptance and reviewers submitting reports on time. Reviewers will be recruited from our reviewer pool, and other suitably qualified academics based on the subject matter of received submissions. We also ask all authors to suggest at least three potential reviewers.
It is important to note that all decisions of the Chief Editors are final and not subject to review or appeal.
The Journal is published two times a year on a flexible schedule based on the quality of submissions received. Accepted articles are published immediately under an Early Release branding.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). This Licence allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
OPEN ACCESS POLICY
This journal provides immediate and free to download open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
This journal subscribes to the Code of Conduct for best practice and ethical journal editing and publication (see COPE http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines). Recognising our ethical and other responsibilities, we take all possible measures against malpractice and we are committed to ensuring that reprint, advertising or other commercial revenue or political gain has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. We publish papers based only on their quality, importance, originality, and relevance to our remit. We evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, citizenship, ethnic origin, or political philosophy of the authors. We are committed to ensuring ethics in publication and high quality of scholarship. Conformance to standards of ethical behaviour is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) warrant that the manuscript is their own, original work and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Submitting the same manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unacceptable. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical conduct and is unacceptable. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: The editors of this journal will evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit and fit with the journal's themes. The editors are responsible for deciding which submitted papers should be published. The editor and any editorial staff must maintain confidentiality and not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. The editors will not use unpublished information in their own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: This journal uses a double-blind peer-review process which assists in making editorial decisions. Once reviewers accept the assignment, they are assigned a due date to complete the review. Ideally, this review process would take no longer than 6 weeks.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by the reviewer without the express written consent of the author. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Peer reviewers’ identities are protected as are authors.
All articles submitted to the journal may be subject to checks for plagiarism. Apart from peer review, the journal uses the software iThenitcate to check for possible plagiarism.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical conduct and is unacceptable. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.